Proceeding contribution from Lord Clark of Windermere (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 21 December 2010. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Public Bodies Bill [HL].
Public Bodies Bill [HL]
I just want to make myself absolutely clear. The Home Grown Timber Advisory Committee was not set up until 1939. The original Act did not include such a body, but it did include an advisory committee that could be used for different purposes. My point is: if it is not costing any money, is it not useful to have in your armoury an advisory committee that can change its interest to face the problem that you may have to deal with? That is the thrust of what I am arguing.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 723 c1085
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Closures Public bodies Non-departmental public bodies Competition Service Commission for Rural Communities Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission Agricultural Valuation Committee
- Legislation
- Public Bodies Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 19:39:03 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_696314
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_696314
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_696314