Proceeding contribution from Mel Stride (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 13 January 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on National Insurance Contributions Bill.
National Insurance Contributions Bill
Does my hon. Friend agree with Mr Mitah from HMRC who pointed out in Committee that the greater complexity and costs involved in the sub-regional route would damage the scheme overall? He said:"““If you have a system that required us to operate a more complicated, or a narrower, range of areas, by reference to which we were giving relief, that would raise the costs of compliance substantially.””––[Official Report, National Insurance Contributions Public Bill Committee, 2 December 2010; c. 35-6, Q121.]"
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 521 c462
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Business Employment Finance Greater London Increases National insurance NHS National Insurance Fund Public sector National insurance contributions New businesses VAT Take-up South East East of England
- Legislation
- National Insurance Contributions Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 14:22:38 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_700181
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_700181
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_700181