Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Chris Leslie (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 13 January 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on National Insurance Contributions Bill.


National Insurance Contributions Bill

Absolutely. My hon. Friends the Members for Luton North (Kelvin Hopkins), for Walthamstow (Dr Creasy) and for Edinburgh East (Sheila Gilmore) have all mentioned that these costs are increasing. As we know, the drugs budgets and so forth are increasing, so this issue will be right at the centre of the national political debate. We know that this Government have a habit of casually casting aside the commitments that they made in the coalition agreement. We really do not want them to rack up yet another broken promise, but it is starting to look as though the Treasury is in that particular space. This situation is not good for our constituents, we want the national health service to grow successfully and we thought that this amendment would offer the olive branch of friendship across the Chamber so that the NAO could, once and for all, clarify whether the Government are living up to their promise. The Minister's description of our attempt as ““a pointless exercise”” is hurtful and, for that reason, we probably have to divide the House to ensure that we can at least test this issue and try to keep the Government to their commitments. Question put, That the amendment be made. The House divided: Ayes 90, Noes 262.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
521 c477-8 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Business Employment Finance Greater London Increases National insurance NHS National Insurance Fund Public sector National insurance contributions New businesses VAT Take-up South East East of England
Legislation
National Insurance Contributions Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk