Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Marland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 13 January 2011. It occurred during Debate on Revised Draft National Policy Statement for Nuclear Power Generation, volumes I and II (EN-6).


Revised Draft National Policy Statement for Nuclear Power Generation, volumes I and II (EN-6)

I do not normally read out the commas, but I shall go back and do that. Yes, the IPC will continue to manage applications until the changeover. As we said in the debate on the national policy statements earlier in the week, we are incredibly grateful for the co-operation that we have received in this changeover period. We consider that all the remaining sites are needed to contribute towards the Government's carbon reduction objectives. That is not to say that all sites listed will have a power station built on them. Eight sites are listed to ensure that sufficient sites are available, even if a number of sites are not developed or they fail to secure development consent. A topic of interest was also the waste that is produced by nuclear power stations and how it will be managed and disposed of. The Government are satisfied that effective arrangements will exist to manage and dispose of the waste that will be produced from new nuclear power stations. This is reflected in the national policy statement. These arrangements include safe and secure interim storage of radioactive waste onsite, followed by long-term disposal in a geological disposal facility. The revised draft national policy statement reflects that we currently expect the geological disposal facility to be ready to take new-build waste in 2130. A second public consultation on the energy national policy statements is under way and is due to end on 24 January. However, this is not the last opportunity for people to have their say should a site be taken forward. Developers must consult communities before submitting an application, and people will also have the chance to input at the application stage. However, this consultation has provided people with a chance to shape the guidance which the planning bodies will use to inform their decisions. Like the other energy national policy statements, the nuclear national policy statement is critical in bringing forward infrastructure developments and ensuring that the right framework is used in the consideration of development consents. I strongly believe that the revised draft nuclear national policy statement is fit for purpose, but I welcome today's debate and look forward to hearing the points raised by noble Lords. I commend the national policy statement to the Committee. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
723 c152-3GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Cumbria Finance Environment protection Infrastructure Floods Kent Planning permission Planning Radioactive waste Nuclear power Nuclear fuel reprocessing Nuclear power stations Security Waste management Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Mixed oxide fuel
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk