Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Clive Betts (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 17 January 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Localism Bill.


Localism Bill

Ultimately, the test will be whether the policy works. My question is this: if the policy does not work, what is the Government's fall-back position? The Bill includes a duty on local authorities to co-operate on a range of issues, and it is important that they do so, because many of those decisions will have an impact beyond the boundaries of an individual authority. What will happen if local authorities do not co-operate? The Bill is vague about what will happen in that case. I have mentioned that local authorities stand at the heart of localism. I believe in elective, representative democracy, so I do not understand why it is necessary for the Bill to spell out what the Secretary of State thinks is a proper increase in council tax and for there to be the power to have a referendum in such cases. Rather than a referendum on whether local authorities should cut services, there can be only a one-way referendum if a Secretary of State thinks that a council tax increase might be excessive, as defined by him. Why can we not just leave it up to elected local representatives to make such decisions? I continually refused to vote for the previous Government's proposals on capping council tax because I did not think that they were right either.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
521 c578 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Community development Housing Infrastructure Homelessness Local government Powers Planning Referendums Public houses Local government services Parish and town councils Social rented housing Tenants Regeneration Regional development agencies Mayors Local enterprise partnerships
Legislation
Localism Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk