Proceeding contribution from Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 18 January 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Fixed-term Parliaments Bill.
Fixed-term Parliaments Bill
I do not understand the hon. Gentleman's argument. If the coalition's motive had simply been to postpone an election for five years in order to have more time to sort the country out, that could have been achieved by prime ministerial decision. What the Bill does is to ensure that the next Government, and the one after that and the one after that, will be subject to these provisions. Perhaps, some day, the hon. Gentleman's party will recover enough to form such a Government.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 521 c802
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Administration General elections Fixed-term parliaments Dissolution Censure motions Prorogation Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Fixed-term Parliaments Bill 2010-12
- Parliament Act 1911
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 14:03:14 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_702058
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_702058
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_702058