Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Clive Betts (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 9 February 2011. It occurred during Debate on Local Government Finance.


Local Government Finance

The Secretary of State's words are very apposite—it is not a lot of money, but there are an awful lot of reductions up and down the country that local government is having to deal with. My first point, which I made in a Westminster Hall debate but still have not received an adequate response, is that the overall cuts in Government expenditure over the four-year period are 19%, whereas the cuts for local government are 26%. Why is local government experiencing higher cuts than the overall average cuts to Government spending? We know that the services delivered by local government are important to our constituents. Some of those services go to those in most need—social services provision for aids and adaptations and for looked-after children. Some of them concern quality of life—for example, libraries, parks, playing fields and sports centres—and others are essential, such as refuse collection, street repairs and street lighting. Most local authorities are doing all they can to protect their social services provision and to protect looked-after children and children with particular disadvantages, so it should come as no surprise that even when they have looked at back-room services and sharing services with other authorities, councils throughout the country of all political persuasions are cutting services such as libraries and bus services and changing their methods of refuse collection.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
523 c400 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disadvantaged Council tax Finance Local government Local government finance Business rates Local government services Cuts
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk