Proceeding contribution from Geoffrey Cox (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 16 February 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill.
Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill
We have but, I think, two minutes—[Interruption.] One minute. During the time in which this subject has been before the House, I have voted consistently but regretfully against the Government's position. I cannot understand why we voted for thresholds in opposition and are voting against thresholds in government. I cannot understand why a party—the Liberal Democrats—that preaches constitutionalism does not appreciate that constitutional protections and constitutional safeguards, such as minimum thresholds on fundamental— One hour having elapsed since the commencement of proceedings on the Lords message, the debate was interrupted (Programme Order, 15 February). The Deputy Speaker put forthwith the Question already proposed from the Chair (Standing Order No. 83G),"That this that this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their amendments 1 and 8, but proposes amendment (a) in lieu." The House divided: Ayes 310, Noes 231.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 523 c1090
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Alternative vote Referendums Voting behaviour
- Legislation
- Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 14:51:00 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_717464
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_717464
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_717464