Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from David Winnick (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 1 March 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Protection of Freedoms Bill.


Protection of Freedoms Bill

I have listened to my right hon. Friend's reservations, which I share: I am very much in favour of a reduction from 28 to 14 days; that goes without saying. Leaving aside whether the House is to be recalled, and assuming that it is sitting, what details will be given to us about those whom it is felt should be held for longer than 14 days? If we cannot have the relevant information because it will prejudice any proceedings that take place if the person is charged, what are we supposed to do? Are we just supposed to nod our approval? If we are not, and the details are given out, it will be argued in any later court proceedings that the House has prejudiced the case.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
524 c218-9 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Children Data protection Databases Counter-terrorism Criminal records CCTV Biometrics Fraud Juries Electronic surveillance Homosexuality Fingerprints DNA Immobilisation of vehicles Freedom of expression Local government National security Parking Powers of entry Protection Police Vetting Schools Stop and search Vulnerable adults Information Commissioner's Office
Legislation
Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk