Proceeding contribution from Lord Redesdale (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Friday, 4 March 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Dog Control Bill [HL].
Dog Control Bill [HL]
My Lords, if they cause fear that is a situation. However, we should take this in context. If noble Lords would read the Bill, its purpose is not to go down the route of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 so that any offence leads to the dogs being taken away and destroyed. If a control notice is given, it might be that it implies only that the owner should keep the dog on a lead in public places. It might imply that the owner should muzzle the dog or that the owner should undergo training. Many of these notices would stop all the problems that then go forward. Many of the dogs that attack children have a reputation for being out of control. Many dogs that attack other dogs go on to attack people. The purpose of this Bill is to bring about an early intervention at that point so that a control notice can be introduced which is appropriate to the situation.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 725 c1301
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Animal welfare Dogs Domestic animals Local government Police Dangerous dogs
- Legislation
- Dog Control Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:24:02 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_721213
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_721213
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_721213