Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Redesdale (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Friday, 4 March 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Dog Control Bill [HL].


Dog Control Bill [HL]

My Lords, there was seen to be a problem with the original drafting of the Bill, which would have made it an offence to allow a dog to show aggression to any animal. That could include allowing a dog to chase a wild animal, even—I have to raise this issue—a squirrel, and that seems unreasonable. This issue was raised at Second Reading and it was one on which we said, ““Ah, we got this one totally wrong””. The effect of the amendment is to restrict the offence to allowing a dog to be aggressive or to intimidate protected animals. The term protected is already defined in the Bill as that in the Animal Welfare Act. What would happen is that this would give a dog the freedom to behave like a dog and to chase wild animals without any fear of the owner being prosecuted. However, it would remain an offence to allow your dog to attack another dog or domestic animal. There has been much publicity recently, as I said earlier, about Guide Dogs for the Blind being attacked and unable to continue to work as a result. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
725 c1303 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Animal welfare Dogs Domestic animals Local government Police Dangerous dogs
Legislation
Dog Control Bill (HL) 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk