Proceeding contribution from Lord Redesdale (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Friday, 4 March 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Dog Control Bill [HL].

Dog Control Bill [HL]

8: Clause 2, page 1, line 24, at end insert— ““( ) the person or protected animal was in a place where they were not permitted to be which was enclosed by adequately maintained and substantial boundaries which would reasonably be expected to be capable of restraining a dog and which was clearly marked to warn such persons against entering; ( ) the dog is being used for a lawful purpose by a person licensed by a body established by the Private Security Industry Act 2001 or a person who complies with BS8517-1;””

Secondary information

Type: Proceeding contribution
Reference: 725 c1303-4
Session: 2010-12
Chamber / Committee: House of Lords chamber
Subjects: Animal welfare Dogs Domestic animals Local government Police Dangerous dogs
Legislation: Dog Control Bill (HL) 2010-12
Link: View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk

Dog Control Bill [HL]

Secondary information

Librarians' tools