Proceeding contribution from Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Friday, 4 March 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Dog Control Bill [HL].
Dog Control Bill [HL]
My Lords, I am afraid that my noble friend has misunderstood my point, which I may have abbreviated a little too much. I am looking at proposed new subsection (5)(a), which talks about an ““appropriate national authority””. I am not sure what makes a national authority appropriate in this case but, in any event, the word by definition must be restrictive.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 725 c1307
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Animal welfare Dogs Domestic animals Local government Police Dangerous dogs
- Legislation
- Dog Control Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:24:10 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_721239
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_721239
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_721239