Proceeding contribution from Lord Redesdale (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Friday, 4 March 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Dog Control Bill [HL].
Dog Control Bill [HL]
My Lords, the purpose of Amendment 13 is that a court may issue an order for the destruction of a dog. It seems reasonable that when such drastic measures are to be taken, the owner must have the right to appeal to save the life of the dog. In many circumstances, a dog that may or may not have shown aggression is someone’s beloved pet, and the owner deserves the right to appeal a death sentence on that dog. The amendment introduces an appeal procedure when a destruction order has been made by a court. The amendment will allow natural justice by allowing an appeal against the most drastic sentences for the dog. I beg to move. Amendment 13 agreed. Clause 7, as amended, agreed. Clause 8: Discharge or variation of dog control notice at instigation of local authority Amendment 14 Clause 8: Discharge or variation of dog control notice at instigation of local authority Amendment 14 Moved by
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 725 c1310
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Animal welfare Dogs Domestic animals Local government Police Dangerous dogs
- Legislation
- Dog Control Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:24:16 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_721250
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_721250
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_721250