Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Redesdale (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Friday, 4 March 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Dog Control Bill [HL].


Dog Control Bill [HL]

My Lords, the purpose of Amendment 13 is that a court may issue an order for the destruction of a dog. It seems reasonable that when such drastic measures are to be taken, the owner must have the right to appeal to save the life of the dog. In many circumstances, a dog that may or may not have shown aggression is someone’s beloved pet, and the owner deserves the right to appeal a death sentence on that dog. The amendment introduces an appeal procedure when a destruction order has been made by a court. The amendment will allow natural justice by allowing an appeal against the most drastic sentences for the dog. I beg to move. Amendment 13 agreed. Clause 7, as amended, agreed. Clause 8: Discharge or variation of dog control notice at instigation of local authority Amendment 14 Clause 8: Discharge or variation of dog control notice at instigation of local authority Amendment 14 Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
725 c1310 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Animal welfare Dogs Domestic animals Local government Police Dangerous dogs
Legislation
Dog Control Bill (HL) 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk