Proceeding contribution from Richard Ottaway (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 10 March 2011. It occurred during Backbench debate on Inter-Parliamentary Scrutiny (EU Foreign, Defence and Security Policy).
Inter-Parliamentary Scrutiny (EU Foreign, Defence and Security Policy)
I just took the view that a free vote was not appropriate. It was a simple subjective judgment; it was as straightforward as that. The key objective of the report and of the motion before the House today is to ensure that the WEU Assembly has a successor. We want scrutiny of intergovernmental activity to continue with national Parliaments in the lead. I say to the House, however, that if national Parliaments do not get their act together, there is a risk that inter-parliamentary scrutiny will wither and that the European Parliament will, by default, take over the main role in this field. There is therefore a responsibility on national Parliaments in this respect.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 524 c1146
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- European Union EU common foreign and security policy Parliamentary scrutiny Foreign Affairs Committee European Scrutiny Committee Western European Union Treaty of Lisbon
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:02:16 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_723972
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_723972
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_723972