Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Richard (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 22 March 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on European Union Bill.


European Union Bill

I am grateful to the Minister for giving way. He will realise that this is a rather complex Bill, and we need to hear the expert opinions of the Government on it. I want to come back to the point that I made a little earlier, which he has not answered. What did he mean by ““in principle””? If he looks at Clauses 3(4) and 4, he will see that the exemption condition or the significance point—they are the same thing—can only apply where, "““the decision falls within section 4 only because of provision of the kind mentioned in subsection (1)(i) or (j)””." Paragraphs (i) and (j) are perfectly clearly spelt out in Clause 4. What happens if it is not in paragraphs (i) or (j)? Presumably there is no question of significance or government discretion. There is no question of it being a decision for a referendum in principle. At that stage, if it is outside paragraphs (i) or (j) it is mandatory. It is compulsory in those circumstances to have a referendum.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
726 c605 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
EU law EU withdrawal EU accession European communities Powers Referendums Parliamentary scrutiny Sovereignty Treaties Reform UK membership of EU Sunset clauses
Legislation
European Union Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk