Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 March 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Offshore Chemicals (Amendment) Regulations 2011.


Offshore Chemicals (Amendment) Regulations 2011

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his robust explanation of these regulations which are clearly important in terms of environmental sustainability in the north-east Atlantic area. I want to explore the Ospar agreement a little. It is very important to us and will be critical in carbon capture and storage, which I shall not go into this afternoon. I am interested to understand how we are doing this to comply with a decision by Ospar. Do decisions by contracting parties to Ospar have to be unanimous or are they by qualified majority voting? What incident brought to the attention of the Government the fact that the previous legislation was defective in some way? Listening to the Minister’s explanation, I was surprised that there has to be this difference between a discharge, and I have already forgotten what the other noun was, but never mind. Will the Minister confirm that other contracting parties to the Ospar agreement—the Explanatory Notes mention the harmonised mandatory control system—are fully complying with that decision, as we are attempting to do?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
726 c121GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Chemicals Oil Pollution control Offshore industry Seas and oceans
Legislation
Offshore Chemicals (Amendment) Regulations 2011
Offshore Petroleum Activities (Oil Pollution Prevention and Control) (Amendment) Regulations 2011
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk