Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Cotter (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 29 March 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Patents County Court (Financial Limits) Order 2011.


Patents County Court (Financial Limits) Order 2011

My Lords, I am glad that the issue of patents is being addressed today. There is no question that SMEs in particular have disadvantages when it comes to patenting products, particularly worldwide, so anything that can happen to encourage SMEs to embark on the patenting route is to be welcomed. At another occasion, another time, I may emphasise that point. As the Minister said, the Patents County Court was created to help SMEs by providing an affordable forum for litigation, but it has been found that improvements are necessary, and today we start on that process. In saying that, though, I welcome the fact that within the regulation there is a requirement to review within three years how this process has progressed. Obviously, at the end of it, if any further measures are required, I would certainly support the Minister from these Benches. SMEs will need to be told about this measure and many similar ones. I see that the benefits will be publicised through the e-mail notification system, which communicates with more than 400 stakeholders. Can we be sure that this means of communicating information will effectively reach SMEs throughout the country? If the Minister cannot provide a detailed answer today, perhaps the matter might be taken away to ensure that SMEs hear effectively and clearly about the measure. On that basis, I am happy to support it and will be glad to hear the Minister's response in due course.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
726 c152GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Damages Costs Business Civil proceedings County courts Copyright Intellectual property Patents Small businesses Trade marks
Legislation
Patents County Court (Financial Limits) Order 2011
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk