Proceeding contribution from Glenda Jackson (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 29 March 2011. It occurred during Budget debate on Budget Resolutions and Economic Situation.
Budget Resolutions and Economic Situation
If the change in the pension system is to benefit the whole country and all pensioners—current and future—why have the Secretary of State's policies targeted specifically women born between '53 and '54? They expected to retire, but now discover that they must work at least four years longer. That does not strike me as a policy that benefits the entire population.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 526 c196-7
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disability living allowance Alcoholic drinks Business Corporation tax Apprentices Budgets Housing benefit Environment protection Excise duties Fiscal policy Economic situation Economic growth Local government finance Pensions Public expenditure Public sector net cash requirement Social security benefits Small businesses Regulation Taxation Technology Unemployment Budget March 2011
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:45:33 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_732178
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_732178
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_732178