Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Steve Barclay (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 29 March 2011. It occurred during Budget debate on Budget Resolutions and Economic Situation.


Budget Resolutions and Economic Situation

The hon. Gentleman mentioned productivity, but I urge him to read what the independent National Audit Office says about the health service. Spending doubled, so of course waiting lists went down—we would expect that—but the NAO found that health productivity fell dramatically. The spending fell to many of the best-paid staff such as consultants, so productivity did not match funding. On procurement waste, the NAO says that Firebuy, an arm's length body set up by Labour, cost twice as much to set up and run as the savings that it made. On NHS procurement, the NAO found that"““NHS…trusts pay widely varying prices for the same items.””" One NHS trust bought 177 types of surgical gloves. The huge waste in the opaque spending in local budgets needs to be addressed. For example, Cambridge fire service spends £1.77 million, an increase of £600,000, on what it defines as ““other services and supplies””. It cannot explain what that spending is. Cambridgeshire police define £7 million of spending as ““other””.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
526 c225 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disability living allowance Alcoholic drinks Business Corporation tax Apprentices Budgets Housing benefit Environment protection Excise duties Fiscal policy Economic situation Economic growth Local government finance Pensions Public expenditure Public sector net cash requirement Social security benefits Small businesses Regulation Taxation Technology Unemployment Budget March 2011
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk