Proceeding contribution from Lord Hague of Richmond (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 4 April 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Africa and the Middle East.
Africa and the Middle East
The hon. Gentleman makes a number of assumptions in his question. I will not necessarily take issue with those assumptions. However, where we have placed asset freezes and travel bans on individuals purely because they are members of a regime, as is the case with the European Union asset freezes and travel bans—we are not talking here about United Nations Security Council travel bans—when an individual ceases to be a member of that regime, it follows that a change in those restrictions should be discussed; otherwise there would be no incentive whatever for members of the regime to abandon its murderous work. When the situation changes and the reasons the restrictions have been placed on an individual change, of course the restrictions should change as well.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 526 c760
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Bombings Civilians Humanitarian aid EU action Politics and government Military aircraft United Nations Violence UN resolutions Sanctions Lockerbie African Union Middle East Yemen Libya League of Arab States World Food Programme Côte d'Ivoire Gaddafi, Muammar Bahrain Koussa, Moussa
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:43:37 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_733715
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_733715
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_733715