Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Matthew Offord (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 5 May 2011. It occurred during Backbench debate on Social Housing in London.


Social Housing in London

Bob Crow earns enough—if we can call it earning—to house himself, so I do not think that he will need such assistance from any local authority. I hope that the Minister mentions some of the reforms that the Government are promoting. I am certainly aware of flexible tenures, which I have mentioned, and fair allocations, but I should like the Government also to focus on greater social mobility. Again, I return to making work pay and to fixed tenancies that allow people to consider their housing needs and, as they change, to change where they live. I want the Government to consider fairer provision for homeless people. I should like local authorities to have greater flexibility to make decisions on how best to stop people becoming at risk of homelessness. Currently, some homeless families turn down the decent private rented accommodation that they have been offered as settled homes and demand to be provided with more expensive temporary accommodation at greater cost to the taxpayer until a social home becomes available. Surely—I hope the Minister agrees—that cannot be right for the taxpayer, and it cannot be right for those individuals. I shall leave my comments there, but as I said, I certainly welcome the debate. It is important; we have heard some good contributions; and I look forward to the Minister's response.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
527 c825 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Council housing Finance Greater London Housing stock Private rented housing Social rented housing Rents Security of tenure Housing trusts
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk