Skip to main content

1-20 of 204 results for subject:"Housing trusts"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Adjournment debate on the Anchor Housing Association and housing for older people.

Lead member
Mike Wood (Batley and Spen)
Answering member
Robert Neill
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
533 c597-602
House
House of Commons

I will not, at this moment. Will the Government also place a responsibility on the reformed Care Quality Commission to work especially closely with providers that, through longevity and acquisition, have long since lost sight of whom they operate to serve? Will the Minister also ensure that social landlords make...

Member
Mike Wood (Batley and Spen) (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
533 c599-600
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for Batley and Spen (Mike Wood) on securing a debate that is important both for general policy and for the specific concerns of his constituents. I also congratulate him on the careful and thoughtful way in which he presented his case. By responding on both...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
533 c600-1
House
House of Commons

I recently initiated an Adjournment debate on older people in Westminster Hall, during which I drew attention to the acute pressure on housing for our older generation. Given that that pressure will become a great deal worse, will the Minister consider the constructive suggestion that some flexibility should be applied...

Member
Tracey Crouch (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
533 c601
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Tracey Crouch (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
533 c599
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for the opportunity to raise this debate and thank those organisations, particularly Age UK, that since the schedule was announced have sent me a good deal of relevant background information. At a time when figures show that those aged 65 and over in our country number 10...

Member
Mike Wood (Batley and Spen) (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
533 c597-9
House
House of Commons

That is an interesting idea, and this is not the first occasion on which I have heard it raised by my hon. Friend and by people in the sector. I will convey it, along with a number of other suggestions, to the Minister for Housing and Local Government, my right...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
533 c601-2
House
House of Commons

Twenty-fifth backbench debate. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Jeremy Corbyn
Answering member
Robert Neill
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Backbench debates
Date
5 May 2011
Reference
527 c793-880
House
House of Commons

In closing the debate, I would like to thank the Backbench Business Committee for allotting us the time for it. There was initially some doubt about whether sufficient London Members would attend the debate and whether it would last the full time allotted to it. We have been proved wrong...

Member
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2011
Reference
527 c879-80
House
House of Commons

I understand the hon. Gentleman's point, but two things have to be recognised. The first is the acceptance in his party's manifesto that the current model of dealing with housing benefit was not sustainable. Secondly, I will go into this in a little more detail in a moment—I hope that...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2011
Reference
527 c875-7
House
House of Commons

I will finish this point, then I need to make way for the hon. Member for Islington North. Some of the more alarmist comments about churn in a city that has a great deal of population churn anyway are unjustified.

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2011
Reference
527 c878
House
House of Commons

The Minister is talking about supply-side interventions. Can he explain why the Government have insisted on the new homes bonus gimmick, rather than putting that money directly into capital subsidy for building new affordable homes?

Member
Heidi Alexander (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2011
Reference
527 c877
House
House of Commons

It is not a gimmick; it is a holistic solution. With respect, the hon. Lady is making exactly the error that Labour Members sometimes make, which is to pluck out social and affordable housing policy and to treat it as though it were separate from the rest of the housing...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2011
Reference
527 c877-8
House
House of Commons

This will have to be the last time I give way to anyone.

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2011
Reference
527 c878
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister confirm something for the record? I understand, following the consideration of the Localism Bill in Committee, that existing tenants who voluntarily downsize to smaller properties or move from overcrowded properties will, after the new rules are introduced, be subject to short-term tenancies. That does not seem to...

Member
Karen Buck (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2011
Reference
527 c878
House
House of Commons

The point is that it is a voluntary change in the arrangements, not what exists at the moment. At the end of the day, we must be sensible and recognise that, if we want more new homes, either we go down the route of pumping more and more public money...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2011
Reference
527 c878-9
House
House of Commons

I want to follow up the point made by my hon. Friend the Member for Eltham (Clive Efford). I was recounting the figures earlier; there are at least three London boroughs in which the 80% rule on rent levels is higher than the average income of people in work and...

Member
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2011
Reference
527 c850
House
House of Commons

We are waiting to see. As I understand it, there is not complete clarity on how people in work will be dealt with, how ““work”” will be defined and whether part-time work will be taken into account. I rest my case in the hope that the Minister will respond to...

Member
Andrew Love (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2011
Reference
527 c850
House
House of Commons

Is it true, as far as my hon. Friend believes, that that contract was given to Mr Nick Johnson under a corporate vehicle so that national insurance on those payments was not paid by Hammersmith and Fulham?

Member
Teresa Pearce (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2011
Reference
527 c862
House
House of Commons

Does the right hon. Lady accept that Ken Livingstone previously set a target of 50% for affordable homes, yet he only ever achieved 36%?

Member
Mary MacLeod (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2011
Reference
527 c810
House
House of Commons