Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 10 May 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Immigration (Designation of Travel Bans) (Amendment) Order 2011.


Immigration (Designation of Travel Bans) (Amendment) Order 2011

My Lords, I was just going to say that I welcomed that information, and the fact that action has been taken in this area. The noble Earl has also explained the reason for departing from normal practice in laying the travel bans order. I have no problem with that. He made some very interesting comments about the proportionate application of the asset-freezing regulations. I say again that I fully understand the reasons for that proportionate approach. I hope that his department will be able to monitor that effectively, as experience shows that proportionate application sometimes leads to gaps that people can find their way through. Therefore, it would be good if one could be assured that these matters will be kept under review. I was glad that the noble Earl was able to report that no particular practical measures have so far surfaced in relation to the instruments before us. Overall, I am grateful to him for the information that he has given us.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
727 c26GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Assets Arms trade Licensing Immigration controls Immigration Exports Export controls EU action Travel restrictions UN resolutions Sanctions EU external relations Libya Gaddafi, Muammar
Legislation
Immigration (Designation of Travel Bans) (Amendment) Order 2011
Libya (Asset-freezing) Regulations 2011
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk