Proceeding contribution from Lord Marland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 18 May 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Weightman Report.
Weightman Report
I, of course, do not like people asking questions, so I am happy for them to go on for a very long time. However, I understand the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, and I am grateful to him for setting out the platform as an experienced scientist in these matters. He raised one fundamental point, which is that we cannot consider just the new nuclear and the old nuclear reactors, but we also have to be vigilant about our decommissioning and reprocessing. As he well knows, I am committed to an investigation before a decision is made on a Mox plant and regenerating Sellafield as a centre of excellence. We are spending £2.5 billion, which in the current climate I managed to get out of the Treasury so that, within the lifetime of this Parliament, we can put our hazard decommissioning into as good an order as it will ever have been. I completely concur with that.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 727 c1391
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Construction Accidents Japan Nuclear power stations Location Regulation Safety Earthquakes Tsunami Office for Nuclear Regulation
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:02:44 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_744154
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_744154
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_744154