Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Wilcox (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 7 June 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Export Control (Amendment) (No. 3) Order 2011.


Export Control (Amendment) (No. 3) Order 2011

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend Lord Thomas of Gresford for recounting his personal experiences as a distinguished lawyer on the subject of execution and I thank him for his support for the order. Yes, the noble Lord, Lord Young, and I have been round these statutory instruments before, but I am grateful to have his immediate support for this one. I apologise for my pronunciation of some of the drugs. I am not up on it—and I am very happy not to have been up on the names of those particular drugs. As to the question of the noble Lord, Lord Young, about the words ““appears to be negligible””, I have it here that there should be minimal if not zero legitimate trade in these drugs. Our consultation has shown that there is no trade. I am sorry, but my official could not understand what was written and I cannot read the reply, which is very embarrassing. I shall try again. It should be ““minimal if not zero””; there is no trade. I am sorry that I made such a fist of that when all I had to do was say that I hope I have dealt with the key points made by the noble Lord and that I commend the order to the Committee. Motion agreed.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
728 c20-1GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Capital punishment Exports Drugs Export controls USA Anaesthetics Sodium thiopental
Legislation
Export Control (Amendment) (No. 3) Order 2011
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk