Proceeding contribution from John Pugh (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 21 June 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Health and Social Care Bill (Programme) (No. 2).
Health and Social Care Bill (Programme) (No. 2)
The public are perfectly entitled to an answer on whether the Bill contains cherry-picking or not, but it is better that they have that answer sooner rather than later. There is a second reason—[Interruption.] May I just set my stall out? The second reason why this must be done properly is that the Bill has so far led to uncertainty and the implosion of primary care trusts. Whoever's fault it is—[Interruption.] People will know that I did not support the original Bill. It has led de facto to the implosion of PCTs and to some irregular adjustments and appointments being made on the hoof—Members can ask their constituents about that—and to some premature arrangements being made.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 530 c207
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Health services NHS Parliamentary scrutiny Reform Social services
- Legislation
- Health and Social Care Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 16:46:34 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_751059
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_751059
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_751059