Proceeding contribution from Andrea Leadsom (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 23 June 2011. It occurred during Adjournment debate and Backbench debate on Private Finance Initiative.
Private Finance Initiative
I think that my hon. Friends are reading my speech, because that was to be my next point. They have obviously been given advance notice. That is exactly the point: the builder, in theory, takes the risk on a project such as building a school, and the LEA only ever starts to repay the debt when the school is built and everything is in place. Theoretically, the builder takes the project risk. However, as my hon. Friend the Member for North East Cambridgeshire says, in reality there is bundling, and because there are sometimes unique risks to a project, often those revert to the LEA. The perceived advantages from the fact that the builder takes the project risk are therefore not always as clear cut as they might appear. In the end the major advantage has been that of not consolidating the debt on the national balance sheet.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 530 c158WH
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Finance Private sector Public sector Public expenditure Private finance initiative Standards
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 22:14:19 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_752885
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_752885
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_752885