Proceeding contribution from Jesse Norman (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 23 June 2011. It occurred during Adjournment debate and Backbench debate on Private Finance Initiative.
Private Finance Initiative
Does my hon. Friend share my view that there is a world of difference between Building Schools for the Future, a form of PFI that the Government could and did cancel, or specific projects which were inherited but which they were uncomfortable with, such as Hartlepool hospital, which they have also stopped, at least for the time being, and the vast preponderance of the 61 projects inherited from the previous Government? The toxic inheritance from the previous Government was an enormous sausage machine, with huge embedded costs, which we have had to deal with despite a difficult economic situation. There is something grossly wrong in comparing £200 billion of spending under the previous Government with the need to get the situation under control. Does he share my view?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 530 c164WH
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Finance Private sector Public sector Public expenditure Private finance initiative Standards
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 22:16:16 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_752901
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_752901
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_752901