Proceeding contribution from Mark Pawsey (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 23 June 2011. It occurred during Adjournment debate and Backbench debate on Private Finance Initiative.
Private Finance Initiative
Does my hon. Friend agree that a justification for a rebate arises from the effect of the spending review on those Departments whose budgets have been reduced? If the PFI element remains fixed within the budget, by definition the non-PFI element has to reduce by a greater proportion, so budgets that may have been reduced by 2% could end up being reduced by 4%. It is entirely appropriate that those who are making the sums of money that we have heard about should bear their share of the burden of getting our country's finances into order.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 530 c169WH
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Finance Private sector Public sector Public expenditure Private finance initiative Standards
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 22:16:12 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_752909
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_752909
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_752909