Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 27 June 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Legal Services Act 2007 (Appeals from Licensing Authority Decisions) Order 2011.


Legal Services Act 2007 (Appeals from Licensing Authority Decisions) Order 2011

As a lay man, I was impressed that it was a consumer champion who made that point. Certainly I will take it on board. I know that in trying to get agreement one has to make sure that the profession is protected and that there are proper guarantees that these matters will not be repeatedly revisited. It is also important that, in getting through the negotiations, consideration is given to the consumer and to securing the clearest and most understandable forms of regulation. As I said when I read my brief, my heart sank a little when I saw that agreement had not been reached and that the bodies were going off in different directions. That was not the initial aim of the Act or the direction of travel that we want. Therefore, I hope that those responsible in the professions will note what has been said in this debate. I will report back to noble Lords and see whether we can help push these things in the right direction. Motion agreed.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
728 c162GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Appeals Conveyancing Legal profession Licensing Law Society Alternative business structures Council for Licensed Conveyancers First-tier Tribunal
Legislation
Legal Services Act 2007 (Appeals from Licensing Authority Decisions) Order 2011
Legal Services Act 2007 (The Law Society and the Council for Licensed Conveyancers) (Modifications of Functions) Order 2011
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk