Proceeding contribution from Michael Ellis (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 30 June 2011. It occurred during Legislative debate on Civil List.
Civil List
The hon. Gentleman may not, but others may choose to do so. In fact, I happen to think that the 1760 arrangements were an historic injustice to King George III and his heirs and successors. There is every reason to say that if the hon. Gentleman is not happy with the arrangements being proposed, perhaps the royal family could sustain having 100% back.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 530 c1164
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Crown lands and estates Civil list Finance Expenditure Historic buildings Travel Repairs and maintenance Royal family Royal household Sovereign grant
- Legislation
- Sovereign Grant Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:32:01 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_755295
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_755295
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_755295