Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Laing of Elderslie (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 30 June 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Legislative Reform Order (Epping Forest).


Legislative Reform Order (Epping Forest)

Yes, it was. I am glad to be able to make that absolutely clear. As the Minister explained, the Metropolitan police are making a significant payment to the conservators of Epping forest, in lieu of rent, and in addition to the payment for the restoration of the site. I hear what Opposition Members say about the amount involved, but the important point is that the entire amount paid by the Metropolitan police will be used for the enhancement of Wanstead Flats. Opposition Members argue that the amount should be greater, but I do not agree. Money paid by the Metropolitan police is taxpayers' money, and if it is used for the enhancement of Wanstead Flats, it obviously cannot be used for the prevention of crime and the maintenance of law and order. There is a wider interest. It is absolutely right for an amount to be paid for the enhancement of Wanstead Flats, but it should not be larger than the amount that has already been negotiated.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
530 c1191 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Conservation Buildings Finance Environment protection Police Olympic Games Public consultation Recreation spaces Metropolitan Police Redbridge Repairs and maintenance Rents Epping Forest Olympic Games 2012
Legislation
Epping Forest Act 1878
Legislative Reform (Epping Forest) Order 2011
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk