Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Featherstone (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 30 June 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Legislative Reform Order (Epping Forest).


Legislative Reform Order (Epping Forest)

I am happy to do that, but may I suggest to the hon. Lady that photographs would be useful in that regard? I was asked whether the legislative reform order procedure would be required if ever a proposal were made to put something similar on Wanstead Flats, and the answer is yes. As I explained during my opening remarks, we would have to go through all this all over again—there is no question about that. The hon. Member for Leyton and Wanstead asked why the facility was not part of the local Olympic park itself. There will be facilities for the police and emergency services, including front-counter services, on the park, but we are talking about different things here, as there are operational reasons why a briefing centre needs to be a reasonable distance from the park. Obviously, if anything happened in the park, people would need to come from outside to deal with it. Redbridge council considered the traffic problems as part of the planning application and was content that the proposals would not damage the local environment. Transport for London raised no objections, and the location was chosen, in part, to avoid potential traffic nuisance.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
530 c1193 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Conservation Buildings Finance Environment protection Police Olympic Games Public consultation Recreation spaces Metropolitan Police Redbridge Repairs and maintenance Rents Epping Forest Olympic Games 2012
Legislation
Epping Forest Act 1878
Legislative Reform (Epping Forest) Order 2011
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk