Proceeding contribution from Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill.
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill
I do not want to prolong this, but that is exactly the situation that already exists regarding the transport strategy. There is a requirement, which if I remember correctly seems almost unduly onerous, for any amendment to the transport strategy to require two separate consultation processes. I look across the Chamber at those current Members of the London Assembly. So the transport strategy is not something that happens suddenly; it happens after a great deal of discussion and process. Yet the Government are saying that the transport strategy can be amended by a two-thirds majority of the London Assembly. I put this question again to your Lordships: why is policing different from transport?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 729 c62
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Accountability Crime City of London Council tax Finance Governing bodies Eligibility Greater London Dismissal Police Local government finance Public appointments Mayor of London Political impartiality Metropolitan Police Standards Witnesses London Assembly Community safety partnerships Police and crime commissioners Police and crime panels
- Legislation
- Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 17:32:03 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_756366
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_756366
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_756366