Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Henig (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill.


Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill

I thank the Minister sincerely for that lengthy response. I tried to follow it fully, but inevitably some points may well have escaped my attention. I will be extremely brief in responding in light of the hour. Again, I do not want to strike a negative note, but not for the first time I despair about what the Government are proposing and what I see as a refusal to listen to sensible advice. I have to say that, because I do not believe that the issues raised by noble Lords were in any way revolutionary or in any way pushing out the boundaries. A lot of the proposals were extremely sensible and based on long experience, and the Government are somehow rejecting them out of hand for reasons that I do not fully understand. Let me give some examples. The Minister has not addressed the deep concerns about the disciplinary issues and the position the chief constable is going to be in. That has not been addressed, although I may have missed it in the lengthy—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c88 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Accountability Crime City of London Council tax Finance Governing bodies Eligibility Greater London Dismissal Police Local government finance Public appointments Mayor of London Political impartiality Metropolitan Police Standards Witnesses London Assembly Community safety partnerships Police and crime commissioners Police and crime panels
Legislation
Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk