Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 12 July 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Localism Bill.


Localism Bill

The noble Lord has been generous in speaking to all the amendments, but I want to be clear on the housing issue that the noble Lord, Lord Beecham, described. We have a similar issue in Luton. One authority with a desperate need for affordable housing that cannot be accommodated within the borough may look across the boundary and see opportunities there, but the other authority may take the view, ““We don’t want any of this affordable housing encroaching upon our villages””. How is that situation to be resolved? You might have one authority that has genuinely gone through a consultation exercise, has taken a view, and has said, ““We don’t want that form of housing here””. Another authority may have a desperate need for that housing. When the soundness of the plan is due to be judged, will the inspector involved just see whether or not the processes and so on have complied with what is required under the co-operation duty, or will there be some value judgment that the inspector can make, and say, ““In all the circumstances, this was an outrageous position for you to take, and you have therefore not complied with the duty to co-operate””?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c651 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Community development Coastal areas Climate change Housing Finance Infrastructure Inland waterways Local government Planning Local plans Transport Regional planning and development Sustainable development Social rented housing Shops Supermarkets Urban areas Local development frameworks Affordable housing Community infrastructure levy
Legislation
Localism Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk