Proceeding contribution from Lord Lucas (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 12 July 2011. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Localism Bill.
Localism Bill
My Lords, perhaps the solution to the difficulty of the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie of Luton, is to reach back into the history of local government and reinstate single combat between neighbouring chiefs, who would then be seen to be earning their salaries at least. In that great Gladstonian oration that we have just heard, I missed the answer to my question. How does the wording in Clause 95 permit the duty to cover the sort of situation that I was discussing, where there is a national network to be looked after and it needs to be discovered where the burden of that falls between various local authorities? I do not see how that is dealt with. I would be happy if the noble Lord would write to me between now and Report.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 729 c652
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Community development Coastal areas Climate change Housing Finance Infrastructure Inland waterways Local government Planning Local plans Transport Regional planning and development Sustainable development Social rented housing Shops Supermarkets Urban areas Local development frameworks Affordable housing Community infrastructure levy
- Legislation
- Localism Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:09:45 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_759799
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_759799
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_759799