Proceeding contribution from Lord Lucas (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 14 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on Fuel: Electricity Supply Licences.
Fuel: Electricity Supply Licences
I am not trying to tempt my noble friend to do so. I am merely trying to tempt him to spend some of his time subsequently discussing it with me. I agree that the EMR review is an interesting paper, and I have read it with great interest. However, I think it misses the point about solar. I will argue with my noble friend about his use of the term ““not retrospective””, and I suspect that my noble friend Lord Liverpool would too. If you put a lot of money into a project and the Government then produce a cut-off that makes it impossible to realise that project, while there may be a few lucky people in Cornwall, there are a lot of unlucky people elsewhere who are losing what for them is a lot of money, even if it is not for the Government. I beg leave to withdraw my Motion. Motion withdrawn. Tabled by
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 729 c900
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Energy Electricity generation Electricity Microgeneration Renewable energy Solar power Feed-in tariffs
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:09:15 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_761077
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_761077
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_761077