Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Fowler (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Friday, 15 July 2011. It occurred during Debate on Media: News Corporation.


Media: News Corporation

My Lords, the Minister referred to the resignation of Rebekah Brooks, and then there was a significant pause. I thought she was going to say that since then there had been another development, but apparently not. However, we had better stop before there is. Outstanding and powerful speeches have been made in this debate, thus establishing my point that there is great experience in this House, direct experience of the media and experience of much more, although the noble Lord, Lord Prescott, and I will have to get back to our usual hostilities on some simple party political issue such as the future of the health service—there are quite a lot of others. I do not intend to try to sum up every speech but simply refer to some common themes that have run through them. One is certainly the position of the Press Complaints Commission, where I think there is virtually unanimous agreement that reform is urgently required. An effective and independent mechanism is needed, a stronger commission, a commission that must have teeth, and a commission where journalists have a fear of the consequences if they transgress the code of that commission. That is not the case at the moment and almost self-evidently has not been. Whether it should be statutory is another question which the inquiry will have to examine carefully and which will continue to be discussed outside this Chamber, not least on our Back Benches. A second theme was the relations between press and politicians and Ministers. Again, I think there is agreement on all sides that there must be more separation. The noble Lord, Lord Howarth, did not like my phrase ““clear water””, but I think he would agree that relations must be on a better and more proper basis than we have seen in the time that he and I have been in Parliament. The relations have been too close, which, apart from anything else, is demeaning for politicians. Thirdly, there has been overwhelming agreement that we must simply clean up the undoubted illegality which has taken place and prevent the insupportable intrusions that have been quite unjustifiably made into our private lives. The noble Lord, Lord Imbert, joked that policemen who are unsuitable for the service might find a career in journalism. I have to point to the report of the Information Commissioner, which stated: "““The cases already raised give us some idea about the companies and individuals who actually obtain the data unlawfully””." The noble Lord wishes to intervene, but I have not given him the full quote yet.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
729 c1060-1 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Criminal investigation Corruption Sky Inquiries Ethics Independent Police Complaints Commission Ownership Police Privacy Newspaper press Mergers Media Metropolitan Police Press Complaints Commission Press freedom Regulation Telephone tapping Politicians News International News Corporation Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press Inquiry News of the World
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk