Skip to main content

1-20 of 10,973 results for subject:Privacy

Type

-
Early day motions (45)
+ Legislation (79) + Acts (6)
-
Public acts (6)
+ Bills (34) + Public bills (34)
-
Government bills (9)
+ Private members' bills (25)
-
Ballot bills (3)
-
Presentation bills (10)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (4)
-
Ten minute rule bills (7)
+ Delegated legislation (39)
-
Statutory instruments (39)
+ Members' contributions (9,084)
-
Business questions (21)
-
Maiden speeches (34)
-
Oral answers to questions (275)
-
Oral question time interventions (4)
+ Oral questions (287)
-
Prime Minister's questions (17)
-
Topical questions (5)
-
Points of order (5)
-
Proceeding contributions (8,517)
+ Parliamentary committees (391) + Committee proceedings (252)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (34)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (22)
-
European Committee proceedings (2)
-
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (74)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (109)
-
Select Committee reports (68)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (39)
-
Select Committee written evidence (41)
+ Parliamentary papers (510)
-
Annual reports (11)
-
Command papers (36)
-
Consultation papers (35)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (12)
-
Deposited papers (198)
-
House of Commons papers (204)
-
House of Lords papers (33)
-
Impact assessments (24)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (2)
-
Treaties (2)
-
Unprinted papers (25)
-
White papers (2)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (620) + Debates (442)
-
Adjournment debates (32)
-
Backbench debates (5)
+ Committee proceedings (252)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (34)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (22)
-
European Committee proceedings (2)
-
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (74)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (109)
-
Debates on select committee reports (13)
-
e-petition debates (2)
-
Emergency debates (1)
-
Estimates days (1)
+ Legislative debates (243)
-
Debates on bills (202)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (41)
+ Monarch's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (1)
-
Opposition days (1)
-
Questions for short debate (8)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Petitions and observations (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
-
Private notice questions (1)
+ Statements (170) + Oral statements (34)
-
Business statements (1)
-
Ministerial statements (28)
-
Select Committee statements (2)
-
Speaker's statements (3)
-
Written statements (136)
-
Urgent questions (4)
+ Parliamentary questions (986)
-
Business questions (21)
+ Oral questions (287)
-
Prime Minister's questions (17)
-
Topical questions (5)
-
Private notice questions (1)
-
Urgent questions (4)
-
Written questions (673)
+ Petitions and observations (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Research briefings (53) + Commons Briefing papers (25)
-
Briefing papers on bills (8)
-
Commons Debate packs (2)
+ Lords Library Briefings (7)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (6)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (1)
-
POSTbriefs (1)
-
POSTnotes (18)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The Online Safety Act 2023 aims to protect people from illegal and harmful content.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
23 October 2026
Reference
CBP-10979

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of existing protections for the privacy and dignity of patients receiving emergency medical treatment in public places; and whether she is considering any measures to strengthen those protections.

Asked by
Pippa Heylings (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 October 2026
Reference
32160
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure greater data and privacy control through the exclusive use of open-source AI models.

Asked by
Lord Taylor of Warwick (Non-affiliated)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
19 October 2026
Reference
HL4285
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if the Government will take steps to help ensure that consumers can opt out of non-essential data collection and third-party data sharing in connected vehicles without losing access to core vehicle functions.

Asked by
Iqbal Mohamed (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 October 2026
Reference
30686
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment her Department has made of the privacy implications of connected vehicle manufacturers sharing Vehicle Identification Numbers with third-party advertising, analytics and data brokerage companies.

Asked by
Iqbal Mohamed (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 October 2026
Reference
31898
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department considers a Vehicle Identification Number (VIN), when linked to location data or account information, to constitute personal data.

Asked by
Iqbal Mohamed (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 October 2026
Reference
31095
House
House of Commons

Statement on the publication of the fourth report of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, Human Rights and the Regulation of AI, (HC 160).

Lead member
Alex Sobel
Department
Joint Committee on Human Rights
Type
Backbench debates; Select Committee statements
Date
15 October 2026
Reference
791 cc211-7WH
House
House of Commons

Thank you very much, Mrs Barker. As the newly elected Chair, I am proud to be presenting the significant findings of the fourth report of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, on human rights and the regulation of artificial intelligence. I thank Lord Alton for his exemplary leadership and service...

Member
Alex Sobel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2026
Reference
791 cc262-214WH
House
House of Commons

This is a fast-moving topic that has continued to be of deep concern to my constituents since the publication of the report. Subsequent to its publication, has my hon. Friend seen any further evidence of the need for mandatory testing of AI frontier models?

Member
Euan Stainbank (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2026
Reference
791 c214WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my fellow Committee member for that question. In the report, we said:

“Many AI systems developed for a specific purpose can be deployed or adapted for use for different purposes and contexts from those intended by the AI developer. Those deploying the system may lack understanding of the risks...

Member
Alex Sobel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2026
Reference
791 c214WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend the Chair of the Joint Committee for this report. I should declare an interest as the Chair of the Science and Technology Committee. I guested on the inquiry, and I share the concerns regarding the potential harms to human rights and support the report’s call...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2026
Reference
791 c214WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend the Chair of the Science and Technology Committee. It has been my great privilege to twice hear Pope Leo address an audience in the Vatican. The second time, at the Jubilee of Governments, last year in June, he addressed this exact issue. This is not...

Member
Alex Sobel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2026
Reference
791 c215WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend will not have failed to clock the comments from the president of Microsoft this week that the UK is best placed to lead on AI governance. That is something that we found in our report, not least because of the AI Security Institute, which our report recommends...

Member
Peter Swallow (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2026
Reference
791 c215WH
House
House of Commons

I absolutely agree. We continually heard evidence right across the industry, both here in the House and externally, about the excellent work that the AISI does. I am pleased that the AI Minister, who is here in the Chamber, has played another leading role in developing AISI as the world’s...

Member
Alex Sobel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2026
Reference
791 cc215-6WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the Committee Chair and the rest of the Committee for their report and all of the work that they have done. I cannot pretend to understand all about AI. I am probably the oldest of the old school when it comes to those things. I agree with what...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2026
Reference
791 c216WH
House
House of Commons

First, AI may have the potential to replace many things, but it will probably never be able to replace the hon. Gentleman’s intervention at the Adjournment debate. We can probably rest assured of one thing in terms of AI development.

I am glad that we now seem to have cross-party support...

Member
Alex Sobel (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2026
Reference
791 c216WH
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps will she take to tackle the sharing of recordings taken by smart glasses and ensure that social media platforms remove this content at pace.

Asked by
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
12 October 2026
Reference
33605
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of wearable recording technology on the adequacy of levels of privacy and safeguarding for children, young people and vulnerable adults.

Asked by
Jamie Stone (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 September 2026
Reference
19404
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, whether her Department has made an assessment of the potential impact of increasing availability of wearable recording devices capable of discreet audio and video recording on regulation of privacy and safeguarding legislation.

Asked by
Jamie Stone (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 September 2026
Reference
19402
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps the Information Commissioners' Office is taking to adapt to the impact of AI technologies on privacy.

Asked by
Mary Glindon (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 September 2026
Reference
20018
House
House of Commons