1-20 of 10,973 results for subject:Privacy
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.304 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.016 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Privacy
- We searched for
- subject_t:Privacy OR subject_ses:92583
Type
House
Session
More
Year
More
Department
More
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
The Online Safety Act 2023 aims to protect people from illegal and harmful content.
The Online Safety Act 2023 aims to protect people from illegal and harmful content.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of existing protections for the privacy and dignity of patients receiving emergency medical treatment in public places; and whether she is considering any measures to strengthen those protections.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of existing protections for the privacy and dignity of patients receiving emergency medical treatment in public places; and whether she is considering any measures to strengthen those protections.
No such assessment has been made. However, the NHS Constitution sets out the right of all patients to be treated with dignity and respect. In addition, providers registered with the Care Quality Commission are required in all care settings to comply with the fundamental standards, including Regulation 10 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, which requires service users to be treated with dignity and respect.
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure greater data and privacy control through the exclusive use of open-source AI models.
To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure greater data and privacy control through the exclusive use of open-source AI models.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if the Government will take steps to help ensure that consumers can opt out of non-essential data collection and third-party data sharing in connected vehicles without losing access to core vehicle functions.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if the Government will take steps to help ensure that consumers can opt out of non-essential data collection and third-party data sharing in connected vehicles without losing access to core vehicle functions.
The UK Government works closely with the transport sector and partners across government to enhance our research and understanding of data collection by connected vehicles and respond to security vulnerabilities.
The government will continue to work with the automotive industry to support them on strengthening the security of their vehicles and will continue to encourage them to be transparent about the data that their vehicles are collecting and how it’s being used.
We need to strike the right balance between the openness and increasing availability of data, whilst protecting UK national security. This will enable a thriving, competitive and innovative economy and protect our way of life.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment her Department has made of the privacy implications of connected vehicle manufacturers sharing Vehicle Identification Numbers with third-party advertising, analytics and data brokerage companies.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment her Department has made of the privacy implications of connected vehicle manufacturers sharing Vehicle Identification Numbers with third-party advertising, analytics and data brokerage companies.
The UK has strong safeguards to ensure that data is collected and handled responsibly and securely. Companies registered in the UK are subject to our legal framework and regulatory jurisdiction.
Organisations that process the personal data of individuals in the UK must comply with the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA18).
An organisation which fails to comply with the UK GDPR may be investigated by the Information Commissioner’s Office and where appropriate subject to enforcement action, including fines.
The UK looks to strike a balance between the openness and increasing availability of data, whilst protecting UK national security. This allows for a thriving, competitive and innovative economy and protects our way of life.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department considers a Vehicle Identification Number (VIN), when linked to location data or account information, to constitute personal data.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether her Department considers a Vehicle Identification Number (VIN), when linked to location data or account information, to constitute personal data.
The UK General Data Protection Regulation defines personal data as information that relates to an individual who can be identified or is identifiable, either directly or indirectly, from one or more identifiers or factors specific to the individual. Whether a potential identifier, such as a VIN or location data, actually identifies an individual depends on the context.
If it is uncertain whether particular data is personal data, as a matter of good practice, it should still be treated as personal data.
Statement on the publication of the fourth report of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, Human Rights and the Regulation of AI, (HC 160).
Statement on the publication of the fourth report of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, Human Rights and the Regulation of AI, (HC 160).
Thank you very much, Mrs Barker. As the newly elected Chair, I am proud to be presenting the significant findings of the fourth report of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, on human rights and the regulation of artificial intelligence. I thank Lord Alton for his exemplary leadership and service...
Thank you very much, Mrs Barker. As the newly elected Chair, I am proud to be presenting the significant findings of the fourth report of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, on human rights and the regulation of artificial intelligence. I thank Lord Alton for his exemplary leadership and service...
This is a fast-moving topic that has continued to be of deep concern to my constituents since the publication of the report. Subsequent to its publication, has my hon. Friend seen any further evidence of the need for mandatory testing of AI frontier models?
This is a fast-moving topic that has continued to be of deep concern to my constituents since the publication of the report. Subsequent to its publication, has my hon. Friend seen any further evidence of the need for mandatory testing of AI frontier models?
I thank my fellow Committee member for that question. In the report, we said:
“Many AI systems developed for a specific purpose can be deployed or adapted for use for different purposes and contexts from those intended by the AI developer. Those deploying the system may lack understanding of the risks...
I thank my fellow Committee member for that question. In the report, we said:
“Many AI systems developed for a specific purpose can be deployed or adapted for use for different purposes and contexts from those intended by the AI developer. Those deploying the system may lack understanding of the risks...
I thank my hon. Friend the Chair of the Joint Committee for this report. I should declare an interest as the Chair of the Science and Technology Committee. I guested on the inquiry, and I share the concerns regarding the potential harms to human rights and support the report’s call...
I thank my hon. Friend the Chair of the Joint Committee for this report. I should declare an interest as the Chair of the Science and Technology Committee. I guested on the inquiry, and I share the concerns regarding the potential harms to human rights and support the report’s call...
I thank my hon. Friend the Chair of the Science and Technology Committee. It has been my great privilege to twice hear Pope Leo address an audience in the Vatican. The second time, at the Jubilee of Governments, last year in June, he addressed this exact issue. This is not...
I thank my hon. Friend the Chair of the Science and Technology Committee. It has been my great privilege to twice hear Pope Leo address an audience in the Vatican. The second time, at the Jubilee of Governments, last year in June, he addressed this exact issue. This is not...
My hon. Friend will not have failed to clock the comments from the president of Microsoft this week that the UK is best placed to lead on AI governance. That is something that we found in our report, not least because of the AI Security Institute, which our report recommends...
My hon. Friend will not have failed to clock the comments from the president of Microsoft this week that the UK is best placed to lead on AI governance. That is something that we found in our report, not least because of the AI Security Institute, which our report recommends...
I absolutely agree. We continually heard evidence right across the industry, both here in the House and externally, about the excellent work that the AISI does. I am pleased that the AI Minister, who is here in the Chamber, has played another leading role in developing AISI as the world’s...
I absolutely agree. We continually heard evidence right across the industry, both here in the House and externally, about the excellent work that the AISI does. I am pleased that the AI Minister, who is here in the Chamber, has played another leading role in developing AISI as the world’s...
I thank the Committee Chair and the rest of the Committee for their report and all of the work that they have done. I cannot pretend to understand all about AI. I am probably the oldest of the old school when it comes to those things. I agree with what...
I thank the Committee Chair and the rest of the Committee for their report and all of the work that they have done. I cannot pretend to understand all about AI. I am probably the oldest of the old school when it comes to those things. I agree with what...
First, AI may have the potential to replace many things, but it will probably never be able to replace the hon. Gentleman’s intervention at the Adjournment debate. We can probably rest assured of one thing in terms of AI development.
I am glad that we now seem to have cross-party support...
First, AI may have the potential to replace many things, but it will probably never be able to replace the hon. Gentleman’s intervention at the Adjournment debate. We can probably rest assured of one thing in terms of AI development.
I am glad that we now seem to have cross-party support...
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps will she take to tackle the sharing of recordings taken by smart glasses and ensure that social media platforms remove this content at pace.
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps will she take to tackle the sharing of recordings taken by smart glasses and ensure that social media platforms remove this content at pace.
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of wearable recording technology on the adequacy of levels of privacy and safeguarding for children, young people and vulnerable adults.
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of wearable recording technology on the adequacy of levels of privacy and safeguarding for children, young people and vulnerable adults.
People may lawfully use smart glasses and other wearable recording technologies in public spaces, in line with rights to freedom of expression as set out in Human Rights law. However, we recognise the potential privacy and safeguarding implications of the increasing availability of wearable recording devices. If wearers of the technology use it in harmful ways, such as to cause alarm or distress or for the purpose of sexual gratification, they may be guilty of criminal offences such as harassment, stalking or voyeurism.
If recorded images are uploaded to the internet, online services that process them will be subject to the UK's data protection legislation. For example, organisations may need to respond to requests from members of the public to have their images removed.
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), the UK's independent regulator for data protection, has recently published guidance on consumer Internet of Things products and services: Guidance for consumer Internet of Things products and services | ICO. It makes it clear that manufacturers, developers and providers of connected devices have responsibilities to make sure that there is sufficient transparency around how the technology is used. This includes making any recording obvious to users and bystanders through visible indicators or alerts, and warning users of risks of recording children or vulnerable people.
We will continue to monitor this issue.
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, whether her Department has made an assessment of the potential impact of increasing availability of wearable recording devices capable of discreet audio and video recording on regulation of privacy and safeguarding legislation.
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, whether her Department has made an assessment of the potential impact of increasing availability of wearable recording devices capable of discreet audio and video recording on regulation of privacy and safeguarding legislation.
People may lawfully use smart glasses and other wearable recording technologies in public spaces, in line with rights to freedom of expression as set out in Human Rights law. However, we recognise the potential privacy and safeguarding implications of the increasing availability of wearable recording devices. If wearers of the technology use it in harmful ways, such as to cause alarm or distress or for the purpose of sexual gratification, they may be guilty of criminal offences such as harassment, stalking or voyeurism.
If recorded images are uploaded to the internet, online services that process them will be subject to the UK's data protection legislation. For example, organisations may need to respond to requests from members of the public to have their images removed.
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), the UK's independent regulator for data protection, has recently published guidance on consumer Internet of Things products and services: Guidance for consumer Internet of Things products and services | ICO. It makes it clear that manufacturers, developers and providers of connected devices have responsibilities to make sure that there is sufficient transparency around how the technology is used. This includes making any recording obvious to users and bystanders through visible indicators or alerts, and warning users of risks of recording children or vulnerable people.
We will continue to monitor this issue.
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps the Information Commissioners' Office is taking to adapt to the impact of AI technologies on privacy.
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps the Information Commissioners' Office is taking to adapt to the impact of AI technologies on privacy.
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is responsible for monitoring and enforcing the UK’s data protection legislation independently of Government. The ICO has published guidance on artificial intelligence (AI) and data protection and is working with organisations on the responsible development and deployment of AI technologies: (see https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/what-we-do/our-work-on-artificial-intelligence/working-groups-and-how-you-can-work-with-us/).
The Government recently used powers under the Data Protection Act 2018 to require the ICO to produce a statutory Code of Practice on Artificial Intelligence and Automated Decision-Making. The ICO also operates a regulatory sandbox to support organisations developing innovative products and services that use personal data in safe and responsible ways.
The Government continues to work closely with the ICO to ensure that innovation in AI is underpinned by high standards of data protection and public trust.