Proceeding contribution from Baroness Gardner of Parkes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 5 September 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Localism Bill.
Localism Bill
My Lords, I have every sympathy with the amendment, as it deals with an important issue, but I am concerned about one thing. I am all for people who have given up their homes to care for someone else to have a right of further occupation somewhere, but where a property has been specifically adapted for a disabled person, I would be much happier to see another disabled person able to use that accommodation. It should not be naturally guaranteed that the person who was there simply as a carer should then take over a property that might be eminently suited to another disabled person. I wonder whether that issue needs to be considered under the amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 730 c96
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Asylum Arrears Housing benefit Housing Immigration Landlords Local government Low incomes Older people Private rented housing Social rented housing Tenants Tenancy agreements Rents Travellers Housing revenue accounts
- Legislation
- Localism Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:16:33 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_765852
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_765852
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_765852