Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Reid of Cardowan (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 6 September 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Scotland Bill.


Scotland Bill

I agree with almost everything that the noble Lord, Lord Forsyth, said—which must be a first. On this point, I am inclined to agree with my noble friend the former First Minister. The reason that the 3p was originally introduced, in about 1980, into our plans for devolution was precisely in order to meet the requirement that a parliament—or an assembly, as it was then called—should not be able to spend endlessly without any obligation to raise its own tax, in answer to the electorate. The reality is that in all of the prior period since the formation of the Scottish Parliament, and precisely because there has been an increasing budget, there was no obligation in practice for it to do that. We may be in a different position now and the question is simply whether we should have a parliament that is allowed to spend tens of billions of pounds but has no obligation whatever to raise any of it or to answer to the electorate for raising that tax.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
730 c178 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Devolved matters Accountability Administration of justice Devolution Airguns Licensing Human rights EU law Income tax Driving under influence Landfill tax Fiscal policy Powers Public appointments Public expenditure Parliamentary scrutiny Scotland Scottish Parliament Taxation Speed limits Tax rates and bands Supreme Court Stamp duty land tax
Legislation
Scotland Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk