Proceeding contribution from Christopher Chope (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 8 September 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (Amendment) Bill.
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (Amendment) Bill
The roads Minister told me that it was not necessary to go ahead with these works prior to the Olympics, but he has effectively told me in a letter that he has now been ordered to go ahead with them because they form part of the Olympic route network. If my hon. Friend the Minister for Sport and the Olympics can do nothing else today, will he confirm that as far as the Olympic Delivery Authority and the Olympic route network are concerned, it is not necessary to proceed with the Canford Bottom construction and improvements before the Olympic games? The route could be secured using the powers in clause 4.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 532 c618
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Advertising Business Licensing Greater London Exemptions Freight Journalism Police Public consultation Public transport Taxis Roads Road traffic control Transport for London Regeneration Vehicles Local press Olympic Games 2012 Paralympic Games 2012 Canford Bottom
- Legislation
- London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (Amendment) Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:25:42 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_767662
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_767662
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_767662