Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 September 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Education Bill.


Education Bill

My Lords, I very much support the amendment of my noble friend Lord Low. Indeed, it is strongly reinforced by other experts in the field. It is clearly unacceptable for there not to be any method of redress for parents of children who are not having their needs met. Children taken into care have been given a lot of attention and it very much looks as though they will be a high priority for school placements and so on. That is right and proper because they are firmly the responsibility of the state. However, that does not mean that there should not be an equal method of appeal for those who fall into a lesser category of concern. I am very impressed by the Local Government Ombudsman, as the noble Lord, Lord Lucas, has clearly been. I am certainly not going to complain because it is part of a government department, but it is equally important that it has local knowledge and can understand local situations. Therefore, I hope that we shall hear that the Minister has a very definite concern about what he has heard and that he will be taking away the whole matter and coming back with something more positive on Report.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
730 c133GC 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Complaints Children Disadvantaged Boarding schools Classroom assistants Community relations Fees and charges Education Further education Inspections Protection Pupil exclusions Pupils Standards Teachers Special educational needs Training Travellers Sixth form colleges Academies Pupil referral units Gifted children Maintained schools
Legislation
Education Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk