Proceeding contribution from Earl of Lytton (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 September 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Localism Bill.
Localism Bill
Following on from the noble Lord, Lord Filkin, and from what has just been said, there is one other point that I should like to flag up for the Minister. I refer to subsection (3) of Amendment 181 regarding the nature of disclosable pecuniary interests. This deals with elected or co-opted members of councils and it concerns an interest of that councillor, or an interest of their spouse or civil partner, or a person who is living with them as husband or wife, or a person with whom that councillor is living as though they were civil partners where they are aware that the person has an interest. I do not believe that subsection goes far enough. The point has been made to me—I am sure that the Minister will be aware of this issue—about the son-in-law’s development project or the sister-in-law’s application to the council. The objective test of external public scrutiny is what we have to meet here. I think that this really does need to be tightened up.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 730 c847
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Councillors Conduct Greater London Authority Local government Standards Standards Board for England
- Legislation
- Localism Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:10:48 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_769695
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_769695
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_769695