Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from James Brokenshire (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 11 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Protection of Freedoms Bill.


Protection of Freedoms Bill

Parliament has shown itself capable in the past of conducting debates about sensitive issues and of being recalled quickly in exceptional circumstances. The current consideration of issues such as phone hacking illustrates how Parliament can consider and discuss very sensitive issues, and Parliament's response to the riots over the summer also highlighted the fact that it is possible for the House to be recalled and to return at very short notice. We return, however, to the principle that maintaining 14 days in primary legislation, rather than having a general order-making power, represents a clear expression of the very exceptional nature of the powers sought, gives Parliament the opportunity to debate the issues and, crucially, avoids 28 days becoming the maximum by default, as it appeared to be under the previous Government.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
533 c263 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Children Disclosure of information Civil liberties Counter-terrorism Criminal records CCTV Crime prevention Criminal investigation DNA Protection Property transfer Vetting Vulnerable adults Surveillance Taxation Voluntary work Remand in custody Criminal Records Bureau Independent Safeguarding Authority
Legislation
Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk