Proceeding contribution from James Brokenshire (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 11 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Protection of Freedoms Bill.
Protection of Freedoms Bill
That point was considered in the counter-terrorism review, and the view clearly expressed was that the debates and consideration would need to be handled carefully, but in our judgment that does not make the process impossible; far from it. Indeed, as I have told the House, Lord Macdonald, in his review of counter-terrorism, said that that was the appropriate way to proceed, reflecting what I have said about telegraphing very clearly the norm: 14 days, rather than 28 days. Therefore, we judge that this measure is the appropriate way forward, but no contingency mechanism will be perfect and meet all the needs of everybody. We do believe, however, that it is workable and practical, and underlines most clearly the norm for pre-charge detention.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 533 c263
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Disclosure of information Civil liberties Counter-terrorism Criminal records CCTV Crime prevention Criminal investigation DNA Protection Property transfer Vetting Vulnerable adults Surveillance Taxation Voluntary work Remand in custody Criminal Records Bureau Independent Safeguarding Authority
- Legislation
- Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:24:21 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_771663
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_771663
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_771663