Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 11 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Protection of Freedoms Bill.


Protection of Freedoms Bill

I take all issues of crime and the victims of crime extremely seriously, and so must this House. I would not distinguish between them in that way. I move on to the question of a six-year limit versus a three-year limit. The Opposition have decided to lay the accusation that their choice of six years is based on secure evidence, but one of their pieces of so-called statistical evidence was based on an extremely small sample that was carried out by the Jill Dando Institute for Crime Science. Its director later noted, in September 2009, that that research study"““was probably a mistake with hindsight, we should have just said 'you might as well just stick your finger in the air and think of a number'””."


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
533 c294 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Children Disclosure of information Civil liberties Counter-terrorism Criminal records CCTV Crime prevention Criminal investigation DNA Protection Property transfer Vetting Vulnerable adults Surveillance Taxation Voluntary work Remand in custody Criminal Records Bureau Independent Safeguarding Authority
Legislation
Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk