Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 12 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Localism Bill.


Localism Bill

My Lords, an argument could be mounted to that effect. I prayed in aid my absence from those debates before, so I shall excuse myself. The question is a fair one, but that does not necessarily mean that the balance should come down in favour of not having this process for the NPPF. It is such a hugely important document. One has just to look at the impact assessment of some of the changes being proposed covering town centre and parking policies. These things are very important and really go to the heart of our national life in so many respects. It is about communities, how we conduct our lives and how we plan for the future. To take that formally outwith Parliament does not seem to be right. In the circumstances, I am inclined to test the view of the House on this matter. Division on Amendment 203L Contents 140; Not-Contents 217. Amendment 203L disagreed. Clause 97 : Abolition of regional strategies Amendment 203M Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
730 c1766 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Climate change Countryside Brownfield sites Housing Local government Low incomes Planning permission Planning Property development Local plans Regional planning and development Sustainable development Renewable energy Wind power Travellers Rural areas Greenfield sites Carbon emissions Affordable housing
Legislation
Localism Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk